Are tax havens stealing money?

Simon Hooper has worked as a journalist covering international news, politics and sports for websites and publications including CNN, Al Jazeera, the New Statesman and Sports Illustrated.
(CNN) — British Prime Minister David Cameron will make the call at the G8 summit in Northern Ireland for international action to curb the activities of tax havens, which campaigners say cost governments trillions in lost revenues. Journalist Simon Hooper points out what he calls the hypocrisy of the UK’s position, itself sitting at the center of the world’s most powerful offshore empire.
Walking up London’s Strand in the direction of St. Paul’s Cathedral does not feel like crossing one of the major financial fault lines in the global economy.

Few tourists would perhaps even notice the stone dragon stranded between buses in the middle of the road that marks the boundary of the City of London, the British capital’s financial district and one of global capitalism’s most dynamic engines.
Yet to step into the City is to enter what has been described by Nicholas Shaxson, author of “Treasure Islands: Tax Havens and the Men Who Stole the World,” as “an offshore island inside Britain.”
Britain’s role at the center of an empire of tax havens is under scrutiny this week, ironically, because British Prime Minister David Cameron has made tax evasion the central theme of this week’s G8 meeting in Northern Ireland.
“Tax evasion and avoidance are issues whose time has come. After years of abuse people across the planet are rightly calling for action,” says a British government briefing released ahead of the summit.
Cameron’s initiative has thrust the spotlight on the UK’s overseas territories and crown dependencies, an odd collection of colonial offcuts including the Cayman Islands, the British Virgin Islands, Bermuda and Jersey. All are considered offshore hubs, and all benefit from close ties to the UK finance industry, pouring money into the City.
![]()
Economic boost for G8 summit host
![]()
Merkel: Europe has lost competitiveness
![]()
North Korea high on G8 agenda
On Saturday, Cameron announced that 10 territories and dependencies had agreed to sign up to an existing convention on corporate transparency promoted by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), saying: “It is important we are getting our house in order.”
But campaigners, such as the Tax Justice Network’s John Christensen, remain skeptical whether Cameron can accomplish anything that will meaningfully challenge the power of the tax havens.
He says measures such as greater transparency in company ownership, though welcome and necessary, do not go far enough in opening up other offshore structures, including trusts, to scrutiny.
Britain is far from alone among G8 countries in the promotion and provision of offshore-style facilities. The U.S. provides parallel structures offering low taxes and corporate secrecy with the New York Times reporting last year on how legitimate businesses and criminal enterprises were flocking to Delaware “in hopes of minimizing taxes, skirting regulations, plying friendly courts or, when needed, covering their tracks.”
Japan and several European Union countries also featured on the last Financial Secrecy Index, published in 2011 and topped by Switzerland. Of the UK though, the index said: “If the entire British network of secrecy jurisdictions were considered, it would easily be ranked number one.”
Legal tax avoidance, which involves shifting profits to jurisdictions that do not levy corporate tax via offshore subsidiaries, and tax evasion, its criminal cousin, have long been among the perks of wealth. As Leona Helmsley, the New York hotelier and so-called “Queen of Mean,” is quoted as saying : “We don’t pay taxes. Only the little people pay taxes.” Helmsley, who was convicted of tax evasion, denied having said this, but the words followed her for the rest of her life.
Yet the consequences of this industry are borne by those who can least afford it. Aid charity ActionAid estimated last month that almost half of all investment into developing countries was funneled through tax havens; this means the profits from that investment remain offshore, depriving the world’s poorest countries of much-needed revenues.
It cited one transaction alone conducted through UK-linked havens that would have netted the Indian government $2.2 billion in tax; enough to provide a lunchtime meal to every Indian primary schoolchild for a year.
A report last month by Kofi Annan’s Africa Progress Panel highlighted mining deals in the DR Congo which had cost the country an estimated $1.36 billion in revenues, enough to double the country’s health and education budgets.
Yet attempting to estimate exactly how much money is concealed offshore is largely futile, with most experts willing to venture only that the figure runs into many trillions. An investigation last year conducted for the Tax Justice Network estimated that $21 to $32 trillion was hidden offshore by super-rich individuals alone.
Campaigners such as TJN’s John Christensen are skeptical whether the G8 can accomplish anything that will meaningfully challenge the power of the tax havens. He says proposed measures, though welcome and necessary such as greater transparency in company ownership, do not go far enough in opening up other offshore structures, including trusts, to scrutiny.
![]()
Starbucks makes UK tax U-turn
![]()
Companies dodging taxes in the UK?
![]()
UK tax ‘outrage’ over U.S. companies
History also suggests the City of London and its allies will defend their own interests. The City’s origins are lost in the distant past, with the corporation’s own website describing the area as “a prime location for trade since before Roman times.”
Its tradition of self-governance predates the consolidation of the modern British state, and the City’s powerbrokers have fiercely defended their ancient privileges ever since, using their role as lenders to crown and government as leverage.
Should Queen Elizabeth II, the UK’s head of state, feel the urge to cross the City’s boundaries to visit the Starbucks on Fleet Street for a low-tax latte, ceremony dictates that she should still seek the permission of the City’s Lord Mayor to do so. (Starbucks in December 2012 offered to pay additional taxes in the UK in response to public pressure there to collect more taxes from multinational companies.)
And since 1571, an official known as the Remembrancer has maintained a seat in the House of Commons to protect and promote the City’s interests in parliament, even as a turbo-charged 21st century financial infrastructure has been bolted onto this medieval statelet.
But the use of the offshore sector has long been virtually endemic among a wealthy elite in the UK, even beyond the City’s boundaries.
British governments once attempted to curb the power and independence of the financial sector, hamstrung only by their borrowing dependency on the same source.
Yet since the 1980s, the era of Margaret Thatcher’s so-called “Big Bang” of markets deregulation, governments have enjoyed a cosier relationship with corporate finance, summed up by Peter Mandelson, a close ally of Tony Blair, who once said the once-socialist Labour Party was “intensely relaxed about people getting filthy rich.”
The rest of that quote — “… as long as they pay their taxes” — is less well remembered.
In 2011, Cameron’s coalition passed legislation exempting UK-based corporations from income tax on overseas earnings; a move described by commentator George Monbiot as a “corporate coup d’etat.”
Research published by ActionAid showed that 98 out of 100 companies on the FTSE 100 index used offshore subsidiaries, with more registered in Jersey and the Cayman Islands than in India and China.
And it has long been a rite of passage for newly-minted Britons, from Formula One drivers to musicians to self-made millionaires, to shift their riches to Switzerland, Monaco or Jersey with the public raising little more than an eyebrow in reproach. Research by the Guardian newspaper last year revealed how Cameron’s own father had built a considerable family fortune by running a legal network of offshore investment funds. Cameron and other members of his family declined to comment on the report.
Yet that situation may be changing, with campaign groups such as UK Uncut stirring up populist anger against corporate tax avoidance and politicians now scrambling to get on the bandwagon, while celebrity tax-dodging schemes have joined sex and drugs scandals as tabloid staples.
Recent exposure of the legal tax avoidance strategies of Google and Amazon saw executives from both companies summoned for scrutiny by the UK’s parliamentary public accounts committee where lawmaker Margaret Hodge told Google Vice President Matt Brittin: “You are a company that says you do no evil. And I think that you do do evil.”
In the U.S., meanwhile, Apple CEO Tim Cook was summoned to appear on Capitol Hill after a Senate investigation found the company paid taxes in the U.S. of 2% on worldwide income of $74 billion.
Accusing the head of one of the world’s biggest companies of “exploiting an absurdity,” committee chairman Sen. Carl Levin made the connection between tax avoidance and efforts to cut the US deficit, and delivered a message that ought to resonate with taxpayers anywhere in the world.
“Because of those cuts, children across the country won’t get early education. Needy seniors will go without meals. Fighter jets sit idle on tarmacs because our military lacks the funding to keep pilots trained,” said Levin.
“The question each of us should ask today is this: Shouldn’t we close unjustified tax loopholes, and dedicate the revenue to educating our children, protecting our nation and building its future?”
READ: Just because tax avoidance is legal doesn’t mean it is right
READ: U.K. should probe Google’s tax affairs: report
READ: 6-step guide to dodging taxes just like Apple
The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Simon Hooper.
Article source: http://edition.cnn.com/2013/06/17/opinion/tax-havens-stole/index.html?eref=edition
Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsRipplesWeb/~3/TtNTA6S-mfI/are-tax-havens-stealing-money

Moacyr Barbosa Nascimento’s life was forever changed after the 1950 World Cup. With Brazil needing just a draw against Uruguay in its final game to lift the trophy for the first time, the team lost 2-1 and he was blamed for the second goal. The goalkeeper’s perceived mistake haunted him. Twenty years later he overheard a woman in a supermarket say to her son, “There is the man who made Brazil cry.”
The Maracana Stadium in Rio de Janeiro was the venue for the 1950 final, with 200,000 spectators packed into the purpose-built arena. The stadium has been redeveloped and a crowd of 78,000 people will watch the final of 2014 World Cup at the iconic ground.
All eyes will be on Neymar during both June’s Confederations Cup and next year’s World Cup. The attacker, who recently signed for Barcelona in a deal reportedly worth in excess of $80 million, is Brazil’s star player and must perform to his best if “La Selecao” are to satisfy an expectant public.
The Brazil team of 1970, which beat Italy 4-1 in the World Cup final in Mexico, is widely regarded as the greatest of all time. Pele, a three-time World Cup winner seen here leaping on his teammates, says Brazil must recover from the failure of 63 years ago.
Luiz Felipe Scolari was the coach of the last Brazil team to lift the World Cup, in Japan and South Korea in 2002. The veteran has been reappointed in a bid to inject life into an ailing Brazil team. His results have so far left much to be desired: two wins, one defeat and four draws since November 2012.
England was Brazil’s first opponent at a refurbished Maracana earlier this month. A half-volley from midfielder Paulinho, pictured, rescued a 2-2 draw for the 2014 World Cup host.
Brazil’s most recent match, the last before the Confederations Cup starts, ended in a comfortable 3-0 defeat of France. A penalty from Lucas Moura, right, completed the scoring.








The Arena Castelao is the first stadium ready for the eight-nation Confederations Cup in June 2013. The competition, which is a dress rehearsal for the the 2014 World Cup, will bring together four former world champions.
View of the Governador Magalhaes Pinto stadium during renovation works, in Belo Horizonte. The stadium will host both the Brazil 2013 FIFA Confederations Cup and the Brazil 2014 FIFA World Cup.
Picture of the famed Maracana football stadium in Rio de Janeiro as renovation works for the 2014 World Cup — including the construction of a roof — gets under way. The Maracana is classified as a historic monument so the facade will be maintained but a roof will be added to the five-storey oval stadium.
Picture taken during the refurbishment works held at the Mario Filho ‘Maracana’ stadium in Rio de Janeiro.
A huge inflatable Fuleco, the mascot of the Brazil 2014 FIFA World Cup, stands by the Maracana stadium in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on January 15, 2013.
A worker swings a hammer inside ‘Arena Fonte Nova’ stadium in Salvador de Bahia, Brazil on December 6, 2012 before next June’s eight-nation Confederations Cup.
A construction worker at the site of the Itaquerao football stadium which will host the opening football matches of the FIFA World Cup 2014 in Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Brasilia’s National Stadium under construction on December 13, 2012. The National Stadium will receive the first match of the eight-nation Confederations Cup matches on June 2013.
A panel marks the exact place of the kick off for the next FIFA World Cup 2014.
Former Brazilian footballer Ronaldo attends a press conference on November 29, 2012 in Sao Paulo, Brazil.
The trophy of the FIFA World Cup 2014, brought to Brazil by former Brazilian football player Cafu from the FIFA headqueaters in Switzerland, is displayed at Morumbi shopping center in Sao Paulo, Brazil, on September 22, 2012.
Police commandos from an anti-kidnapping unit, arrest and control a group of ‘terrorists’ during a drill at the Tom Jobim International Airport in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on January 13, 2012.
People chant slogans during a protest against the demolition of the Celio de Barros track and field stadium in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil on January 13, 2013. The stadium needs to be demolished to carry out the Maracana stadium construction plans ahead of the 2013 FIFA Confederations Cup, 2014 FIFA World Cup and 2016 Olympic games.
The Rio 2016 Olympics logo is seen on a wall of the future Olympic Park in construction in Barra de Tijuca, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil on November 20, 2012.
Carlos Arthur Nuzman (left), Brazilian Olympic Committee President and Rio 2016 Olympics Committee President, shakes hands with London 2012 Chief Executive Paul Deighton after delivering the IOC debriefing of the London 2012 Olympic Games for the foreign press in Barra de Tijuca, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
People hold a huge banner during a demonstration demanding that Brazilian President Dilma Roussef veto a bill that would redistribute oil royalties in favor of non-oil producing states.
The construction site of the future Olympic village for the Rio 2016 Olympic games in Barra de Tijuca, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil on November 20, 2012, Brazil.
Journalists are shown a virtual tour of the city organized by the Rio 2016 Committee on November 19, 2012 in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil. 

















Ronaldinho was making his first appearance for Brazil in over a year, but he struggled. The two-time World Player of the Year missed a penalty before being substituted at half-time in a 2-1 defeat by England.
Neymar is the star of the current Brazil team. The Santos playmaker also endured a frustrating match, failing to breakdown England’s stubborn defence.
Brazil captain David Luiz, fourth from the left, is confident La Selecao can win the World Cup when it is staged in the South American country for just the second time next year.
In a bid to transform Brazil’s fortunes, Luis Felipe Scolari has been reinstated as coach. Scolari led Brazil to World Cup glory in 2002.
All Brazilians fear a repeat of the 1950 World Cup, when hosts Brazil lost 2-1 to Uruguay in the final game of the tournament and missed out on glory. The defeat was referred to as “our Hiroshima” by Brazilian playwright Nelson Rodrigues.












Japanese descendants perform a traditional dance during the Ethnic Dance festival in Curitiba, Brazil. The country is home to 1.8 million ethnic Japanese, the largest community outside Japan.
Kimono exhibition at the Sao Paulo State Government Palace, organized in celebration of the 105th anniversary of Japanese immigration to Brazil. The first settlers came to escape poverty in Japan and work on Brazil’s coffee plantations which were in need of laborers after the abolition of slavery.
Some of these garments were brought to Brazil by the first Japanese immigrants in 1908. They encountered harsh conditions and new diseases in their adopted homeland, but most managed to elevate themselves from poverty and get an education within one generation.
Japanese art teachers show off their colorful kimonos for the exhibition opening. Many younger Japanese Brazilians keep in touch with their heritage by spending several months in their ancestors’ homeland, on a Japanese government grant, studying traditional dance, tea ceremony , and ikebana — the traditional Japanese art of arranging flowers.
Liberdade, a central Sao Paulo neighborhood, feels more like Tokyo due to 600,000 Japanese descendents who live there. At weekends its buzzy food stalls attract residents of all nationalities. 





































































Apple CEO Tim Cook announced a handful of new products Monday at WWDC 2013, his company’s annual conference for its developers. Click through this gallery for highlights from past WWDCs.
Steve Jobs, then Apple’s interim CEO, gave the keynote address in May 1999 at the company’s annual Worldwide Developers Conference, or WWDC, typically a launching pad for products. That year Jobs announced a new Powerbook computer.
Apple CEO Steve Jobs demonstrated a preview of Apple’s forthcoming Mac OS X operating system during his WWDC keynote address in May 2000.
At this WWDC, Jobs announced that Apple’s Mac OS X would be pre-installed along with Mac OS 9 in all new Mac computers.
At the 2002 WWDC, Jobs presided over a theatrical mock funeral for Apple’s OS 9 operating system, complete with casket, fog and organ music. “It’s been a good friend,” he said.
At WWDC 2003, Jobs unveiled the new Power Mac G5 desktop computer as well as iPhoto, iMovie and other software tools. That year Apple also pre-screened the Pixar movie, “Finding Nemo.”
Jobs posed here with a new flat-panel display, the first 30-inch model designed for the personal computer. He also announced the 2005 release of OSX Tiger.
Jobs opened his 2005 WWDC keynote by using a computer with an Intel processor, representing Apple’s switch from IBM to Intel for its processing chips.
Attendees eyed a new Apple Mac Pro desktop computer at the WWDC in 2006 in San Francisco. Jobs kicked off the conference with announcements of a new Mac Pro desktop computer and a forthcoming Mac OS X Leopard operating system.
This WWDC marked the launch of the original iPhone, which had been unveiled at an event in January of that year. The phone went on sale in the United States three weeks later, on June 29.
Apple CEO Steve Jobs launched the iPhone 3G, and compared it to other phones, at the 2008 WWDC. He also introduced the App Store, which would open to the public the next month and has served more than 50 billion downloads to date.
Apple Senior Vice President of iPhone Software Scott Forstall wore a lab coat and safety goggles while demoing a science app for the iPhone at the WWDC in June 2009. Jobs, suffering from cancer, was on medical leave at the time. That year Apple kicked off the conference by unveiling the iPhone 3GS.
Jobs, looking alarmingly thin, introduced the iPhone 4 during his keynote address at the 2010 WWDC.
Jobs returned from another medical leave to deliver the WWDC keynote address on June 6, 2011, when he introduced Apple’s iCloud storage system. The Apple co-founder died four months later.
Tim Cook gave his first WWDC keynote at the 2012 conference, where he announced new models of the MacBook Air and MacBook Pro laptops.















DC Entertainment recently announced that it was killing the character of Robin in the latest issue of
Batwoman’s homosexuality was revealed 
Marvel Comics canceled a number of their long-running books and
For nearly 75 years, Clark Kent and “The Daily Planet” were synonymous. But in 2012, Superman’s alter ego
Professor Xavier died in issue 11 of the much-hyped “Avengers vs. X-Men” miniseries in 2012, an event that sent ripples throughout the X-universe.
Northstar popped the question in “Astonishing X-Men” #50, and he got married the following month.
It’s been a topic of fan conversation for decades, but it finally happened in 2012: Superman hooked up with Wonder Woman. The current version of Superman has yet to date Lois Lane. He’s trying to make it work with the Amazon princess.
On television and in comics, “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” has pushed boundaries. “Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Season Nine” dealt with abortion, a rarely discussed topic in comics. Two 2012 issues featured a story in which the slayer decided to terminate a pregnancy.
For years, it was unthinkable: a prequel to “Watchmen”? Comics’ most acclaimed miniseries got just that in 2012 and 2013, with
In “Earth Two” #2, Alan Scott, the first Green Lantern, was
In 2011, DC Comics went forward with one of the most risky moves in comic book history. Every book was
In a much-hyped issue of “Fantastic Four,” the Human Torch
In 2011, Superman decided he would no longer be a citizen of the United States after his attempts to settle conflicts in the Middle East got him in hot water with the government. It was a big deal for the onetime protector of “truth, justice and the American way.”

The death of Captain America by an assassin’s bullet in 2007 (and his inevitable return in 2008) were seen as a reflection of the times and the United States’ place in the world.
















